Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Trice

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1857PublishedCited by 32 opinions

This cause was tried at November term, 1856, of the Warren Circuit Court, Thompson, Judge, -presiding. There was a verdict and judgment for the appellee. A motion for a new trial was denied. The opinion of the court furnishes a statement of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSkinner, J.

Trice sued Babcock and declared in indebitatus assumpsit for corn sold and delivered. Babcock pleaded the general issue and a special plea of set-off, for money had and received, etc. Babcock proved a special contract for the ■sale and the delivery of the corn, at a warehouse upon a railroad, in sacks, at fifty cents -per bushel; and proved that some of the corn, when delivered at the warehouse, was in a damaged •condition and of less value than sound merchantable corn. The corn was delivered through a warehouseman and it did ■not appear that Babcock had seen, or knew the condition of the…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. Underwood v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Doane v. DunhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Bunch v. WeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  4. Morse v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
  5. Murchie v. CornellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API