Noel v. Garford Motor Truck Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, James B. Murphy, judge pro tempore, entered August 8, 1919, in favor of the plaintiffs, in consolidated actions for rescission and to foreclose a chattel lien, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The two above entitled cases were consolidated in the superior court and tried as one action. The subject-matter of the litigation was a motor truck. In one of the cases, the plaintiffs were seeking to rescind the contract of purchase and recover their money back. In the other, the seller was attempting to foreclose a lien for labor performed upon the truck. The trial court sustained the right of rescission and entered a judgment accordingly. From this judgment, the Garford Motor Truck Company appeals. The controlling facts are not in material dispute.
On May 26, 1918, Fred Noel, one of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schroeder v. Hotel Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Dickinson Fire & Pressed Brick Co. v. Crowe & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Klock v. NewburyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Burnley v. ShinnWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Fink v. MarrWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kesinger v. BurtrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- McDonald v. SandersSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Eliason v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Park Circle Motor Co. v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- American Exchange Bank v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1933