Legal Opinion

Gruendler Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co. v. Preston Grain & Milling Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923No. 17644PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— Respondent, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover the purchase price of an alfalfa mill sold under a written contract to appellant. The contract contains the following conditions:

“Guarantee: We guarantee every machine or part thereof to be free from defects in material and workmanship, subject to replacement free of charge F.' O. B. Factory if defects develop within one year, upon re-' turn of broken part, prepaid to factory. We assume *480no liabilities for damages on account of delays, nor will we make allowance for repairs or alterations unless same are made with our consent and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fink v. MarrWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Johnson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McGirr v. FarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API