United States v. Alameda Gateway, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America brought this action against defendant Alameda Gateway, Ltd., (“Gateway”) alleging that Gateway’s refusal to remove portions of two piers in Oakland’s Inner Harbor is a violation of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (“RHA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 403, 406. Now before the court is the United States’ motion for an injunction barring Gateway from obstructing, hindering or interfering with the Army Corps of Engineers’ plans to remove the ends of the two piers in order to create a new turning basin.
Having considered the parties’…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alameda Gateway, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- United States v. HernandezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997
- United States v. Foresome Entertainment Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002