Legal Opinion

Board of Supervisors v. Dolan

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1975No. Civ. 36076PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, J.

In this mandate proceeding, we are called upon to determine the constitutionality of the Marks-Foran Residential Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Health & Saf. Code, 1 § 37910 et seq., hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), which authorizes cities, counties, cities and counties, and redevelopment agencies and housing authorities within such cities, counties, and cities and counties, to make long-term, low-interest loans to finance residential rehabilitation in depressed residential areas in order to encourage the upgrading of property in such areas (§ 37911) and to issue bonds for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. James v. ValtierraSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. San Francisco Unified School District v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. League of Women Voters v. Countywide Criminal Justice Coordination CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Schettler v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Anderson v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. City of Downey v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API