Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Oglesby
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 24, 1985No. 84-1934PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The defendant appeals his conviction for “Bank Robbery and Incidental Crimes” under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 arguing that his trial should have been severed from that of his co-defendant after his co-defendant decided to proceed pro se. The defendant additionally challenges the trial court’s refusal to suppress his confession, its denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, and his sentence of twenty years imprisonment. We affirm.
I
The testimony at the trial of Oglesby and his co-defendant, Mitchell, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. John Hedman, Michael Jercich, Thomas Karnick and Henry Larsen, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Joseph Pace, Anthony Besase, Christ Savides, Donald Smith, John Cialoni, and Robert WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Frank M. Miller, Jr. v. Peter J. Fenton, Superintendent, Rahway State Prison, Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General, State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.