United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando Estevez
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The appellants are five defendants who were convicted of various offenses under the federal narcotics laws. Their appeals raise a plethora of difficult issues for our consideration. We affirm the convictions of all defendants. However, we vacate Me-nelao Orlando Estevez’ sentence and remand his case to the district court for resentencing.
I
Background
A. Facts
This case arises out of an extensive cocaine network centered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Testimony at trial revealed the following. Evilio Pinto, 1 an unindicted conspirator, was introduced to Rigoberto Moya-Gomez…
2Cases cited224 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by364 opinions
- United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
359 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.