Legal Opinion
Whiteside v. New Castle Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 22, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-59 MMSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs George and Donna Whiteside (“the Whitesides”) brought this diversity action against defendants New Castle Mutual Insurance Company (“New Castle Mutual”) and Downs & Company (“Downs”) to recover money owed them under a homeowners’ insurance policy issued by defendants. Presently before the Court is defendant Downs’ motion for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claim for attorney’s fees. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion will be denied.
I. Facts
For purposes of this motion, the facts are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chesapeake Utilities Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- CIGNA Ins. Co. v. Didimoi Prop. Holdings, NVDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2000
- Government Employees Insurance v. RopkaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- RLS ASSOCIATES, LLC v. United Bank of Kuwait PLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Koken v. GPC International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.