Legal Opinion

Poorbaugh v. Mullen

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1981No. 4508PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

Plaintiff, Fred Poorbaugh, sued Leo Mullen for defamation and emotional distress resulting over a real estate transaction in which Mullen was the purchaser and Poorbaugh the broker or vendor. Defendant counterclaimed for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, wrongful forfeiture, and related claims arising out of the same real estate transaction. The trial court ordered Summary judgment in favor of plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed defendant’s counterclaims. We reverse.

The issues on appeal are whether the Summary judgment was proper and whether the counterclaims should have…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Watts v. Swiss Bank Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. GoffeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  4. C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. James S. Gerrard v. William G. Larsen, Special Administrator of the Estate of Jack K. Gibbens, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Koenig v. PerezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kern Ex Rel. Kern v. St. Joseph Hospital, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Golden Cone Concepts, Inc. v. Villa Linda Mall, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Poorbaugh v. MullenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API