Legal Opinion
Hoblitzell v. Howard
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 10, 1954Published
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 159 (1954)
103 A.2d 625
WALTER R. HOBLITZELL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
W. FRANCK HOWARD, WILLIAM C. HOBLITZELL, H.O.B. MOTORS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN E. TOOLAN AND JOSEPH J. SEAMAN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided March 10, 1954.
Mr. George F. Hetfield for the plaintiff (Messrs. Hetfield & Hetfield, attorneys).
Mr. Meyer E. Ruback for the defendants W. Franck Howard, William C. Hoblitzell, John E. Toolan and Joseph J. Seaman (Messrs. Ruback, Albach & Weisman, attorneys).
Mr. Daniel G. Kasen for the defendant H.O.B. Motors, Inc. (Messrs. Kasen,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oswego Falls Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Green v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Durkee v. Illinois Cent. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1897
- Threadgill v. PlattU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia · 1895
- Baker v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.