Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 4, 1955No. 36,590, 36,591PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
Appeals from an order denying defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial.
Plaintiff Walfred Nelson is a builder by trade. In the fall of 1947 he began construction of an apartment building in the city of St. Paul. He let the contract for plumbing and heating to defendants Theodore T. Anderson and Arthur A. Anderson, doing business as Anderson Brothers Plumbing & Heating Company. This contract called for installation of an Enterprise oil burner among other things. Defendant Grudem Brothers Company, Inc., was the exclusive…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bahlman v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Ringstad v. I. Magnin & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Challis v. HartloffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Fredendall v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Uhlig v. BarnumNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Markman v. HoeferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Elizabeth Margaret Dallison and Max Dallison v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.