Legal Opinion

Fredendall v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1938PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff bought from defendant a gallon container of “ Globe Quick-Dry Fluid for Dry Cleaning.” A “ caution ” displayed thereon announced that “ the fluid contains ingredients which produce vapors, which if inhaled in large amounts, may cause discomfort and distress ” and that “Lwith reasonable care it can be used with absolute safety.” Among other “ precautions ” suggested were the following: “Always clean and dry the garment outdoors or in a room well ventilated by a cross draft. The room should be as cool as possible. After cleaning, garments should be hung outdoors or in a well…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Universal Oil ProductsTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Maiorino v. Weco Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Ringstad v. I. Magnin & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Crotty v. Shartenberg's-New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API