Martindale v. Shaha
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by Richard Shaha against D. M. Martindale and others, partners as Deichman & Martindale. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
This action was commenced by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error to recover the sum of $5,000 claimed to be due as his part of a fee in á divorce suit collected and appropriated by them. There was a trial to the court and a jury, and a verdict returned for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,774. From the judgment entered upon this verdict, an appeal has been prosecuted to this court.
It is first complained that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to the petition, on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Planters' Bank v. Union BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Cook v. ShermanUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ferris v. SnivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- White v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Dow v. United States Ex Rel. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Kennoy v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Matchett v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.