Legal Opinion
Bryant
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 17, 1978No. Nos. 15-75 and 76-77PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
"These consolidated cases come before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment in opposition to plaintiffs’ claim for just compensation under the taking clause of the fifth amendment of the United States Constitution.
"Each of the plaintiffs herein owns property along the Santa Ana River in California, downstream from the Prado Dam, a flood control project constructed in 1941 and operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. During January and February 1969, the area experienced severe and unusual rainstorms. Flood waters, impounded behind Prado Dam, were released in quantities…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- B Amusement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Hartwig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Royal Indemnity Company v. The United States and Jersey State Bank, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Teresa Fromme v. The United States and Victoria County Navigation District, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Foote Mineral Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Accardi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Baird v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Arneson v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Ridgewell's, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.