Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Company v. The United States and Jersey State Bank, Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 20, 1967No. 202-65PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWEN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Royal Indemnity Company (hereinafter “Surety”), a Miller Act surety, claims $38,461.29 in retainages held by the Government pursuant to its contract with Albert M. Barbato (hereinafter “Contractor”), Surety’s principal. Jersey State Bank (hereinafter “Bank”), contractor’s assignee, was brought in as a third party pursuant to Rule 23 and claims $31,200, plus interest, of the re-tainages. Defendant admits that it holds $38,461.29, but seeks to offset $2,213.07, plus interest, for withholding taxes not paid by Contractor; defendant considers itself a stakeholder for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Bruce Construction Corporation v. United States of America for Use of Westinghouse Electric Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Construcciones Werl, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
  2. Singleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Barber ex rel. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  5. Olympic Insurance Company v. H. D. Harrison, Incorporated D/B/A Harrison Insurance Service, Hugh D. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API