Legal Opinion

Betz v. Tacoma Drug Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1942No. 28868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted by Harry Betz against Tacoma Drug Company, a corporation, to recover damages for breach of an alleged real estate option, claimed to have been given by defendant to plaintiff.

The complaint in substance alleged that on March 19, 1936, plaintiff and defendant, through its president, C. F. Osmers, entered into an option agreement, which was given to plaintiff for a period of sixty days from March 19, 1936, for a stated consideration of one dollar, and which covered certain real estate in the city of Tacoma, which it is alleged belonged to defendant. The original option…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mooney v. Mooney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Parker v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Reuter Organ Co. v. First Methodist Episcopal ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Peninsular Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C. J. Breier Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Belcher v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Taylor Land & Livestock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Smith v. Hansen, Hansen & Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Bhupinder Dhillon v. Bbc Holdings IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Pierce v. Astoria Fish Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API