Gomez v. Rossi Concrete, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Reynaldo Galvan, Juan Martinez, Andres Millan, and Zacarías Millan (“Moving Plaintiffs”) have filed a motion for class certification [Doc. 35], For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
This is a putative class-action suit by construction workers against their employer, Defendant Rossi Concrete, Inc.1 Rossi Concrete is a concrete contractor that works mainly in Southern California. Plaintiffs allege a variety of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Interpipe Contracting, Inc. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Swigart v. Fifth Third BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Bee, Denning, Inc. v. Capital Alliance GroupDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Greenley v. Mayflower Transit, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.