Bee, Denning, Inc. v. Capital Alliance Group
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION(2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
CYNTHIA BASHANT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Bee, Denning, Inc. (“Bee”) and Gregory Chick (“Chick”) bring this putative class action against Defendants Capital Alliance Group (“Capital Alliance”) and Narin Charanvattanakit (“Narin”) alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiffs now move for certification of two proposed classes pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. (ECF No. 26 at Exh. A (“Pis.’ Mot.”)) Defendants filed…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bouton v. Ocean Properties, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Lucas v. Breg, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- Gorss Motels, Inc. v. At & T Mobility LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Caldera v. American Medical Collection AgencyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Cordoba v. DirecTV, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.