Legal Opinion
Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 17, 2011No. 2:08-CV-06755-JST (MANx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Class Certification filed by Plaintiffs Blanco Alonzo, Jodi Valdes, and Michelle Da-buet (collectively “Plaintiffs”). (Mot., Doc. 76.)1 Defendant Maximus, Inc. (“Defendant”) opposed the Motion, and Plaintiffs replied. (Opp’n, Doe. 77; Reply, Doc. 89.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification.
II. Background
Defendant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Alonzo v. Maximus, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Arredondo v. Delano Farms Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- In re NJOY, Inc. Consumer Class Action LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.