Winniebell Fehling v. Carl Cantonwine and Juanita Cantonwine
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Winniebell Fehling appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming, dismissing her complaint against appellees Carl and Juanita Canton wine for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellant is a Colorado resident. Appellees are Wyoming residents. On October 1, 1966, appellees executed five promissory notes, each in the amount of $3,000, payable on demand “to Frank Fehling and Winniebell Fehling.” These notes were executed in Banner, Wyoming. On October 20, 1966, Frank Fehling, appellant’s husband, executed a will which provided, inter alia:
I…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sutton v. EnglishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Richard C. Lonnquist v. J. C. Penney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- H. R. Gibson, Sr., D/B/A Gibson Products Company v. Clinton E. Jeffers, Commissioner of Agriculture, State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Colonial Airlines, Inc. v. JanasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Continental American Corporation, D/B/A Pioneer Balloon Company, Plaintiff v. Camera Controls Corporation, D/B/A Max Balloon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Oatts v. JorgensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Cantonwine v. FehlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Choman v. EpperleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re McMeekinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.