Legal Opinion
Continental American Corporation, D/B/A Pioneer Balloon Company, Plaintiff v. Camera Controls Corporation, D/B/A Max Balloon Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1982No. 81-2264PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a trial to the court in the amount of $5,158.83 in an action for breach of contract. Subject matter jurisdiction was founded on diversity, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 1 Defendant-appellant Camera Controls Corporation, doing business…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Vernon and Bonnie Rambo v. American Southern Insurance Company, Mid South Claim Services, Inc., and W.T.R., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Far West Capital, Inc. And Steamboat Development Corp. v. Dorothy A. Towne and Fleetwood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Melea, Ltd. v. Jawer SaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Carrothers Construction Co. v. Quality Service & Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.