Legal Opinion
Pittman v. Harbin Clinic Professional Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 19, 1993No. A93A1525, A93A1527, A93A1526, A93A1528PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
Neurosurgeons Harris Pittman, Dennis Murphy, and Carl Herring, and neurologists Robert and William Naguszewski brought an action against their former employer, the Harbin Clinic Professional Association, seeking a declaration that the covenants in their respective employment contracts restricting them from competing with the clinic after leaving its employ were unenforceable. The clinic answered and counterclaimed, seeking to enjoin the doctors from establishing their new practices in the Rome, Georgia, area in violation of the covenants in their contracts. The trial court found…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Karlin v. WeinbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Nasco, Inc. v. GimbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Watson v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Rash v. Toccoa Clinic Medical AssociatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C. v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Physician Specialists in Anesthesia, P.C. v. MacNeillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- McAlpin v. Coweta Fayette Surgical Associates, P. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Concord Orthopaedics Professional Ass'n v. ForbesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Hostetler v. Answerthink, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.