Legal Opinion
Nasco, Inc. v. Gimbert
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 7, 1977No. 32378PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hill, Justice.
The plaintiff, Nasco, Inc., sought injunctions and liquidated damages against Gimbert, a former employee, based on noncompetition, nonsolicitation and nondisclosure covenants in his employment contract. Plaintiff also sought an injunction prohibiting the defendant from hiring plaintiffs employees under employment contracts with the plaintiff. The trial court denied injunctive relief and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
1. The two-year covenants against competition, customer solicitation and disclosure, set forth in the contract, expired on April 9, 1977.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Luke v. DuPreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Thomas v. Best Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Jenkins Brick Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. John E. Bremer, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, Aaa Spec Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Ferrero v. Associated Materials Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Douglas J. MacGinnitie v. Hobbs Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Kronovet v. LipchinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.