Legal Opinion

W. R. Grace & Co. v. Mouyal

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 21, 1992No. S92Q0994PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Justice.

This case is before this court as a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, pursuant to OCGA § 15-2-9 and Rule 37 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Georgia. See W. R. Grace & Co., Dearborn Div. — Conn. v. Mouyal, 959 F2d 219 (11th Cir. 1992). The question centers on the enforceability of a no-solicitation clause contained in an employment agreement between the parties. The clause reads as follows:

Employee agrees that during the period of eighteen months immediately following cessation of Employee’s employment with Dearborn,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Howard Schultz & Associates of Southeast, Inc. v. BroniecSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Durham v. Stand-By Labor of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Singer v. Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Douglas J. MacGinnitie v. Hobbs Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Palmer & Cay, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Advance Technology Consultants, Inc. v. RoadTrac, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Habif, Arogeti & Wynne, P.C. v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API