Legal Opinion

Houbigant Sales Corp. v. Woods Cut Rate Store

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 29, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant, Houbigant Sales Corporation, is the sole exclusive distributor of the products manufactured by Houbigant, Incorporated, which are in fair and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced by others. It has expended large sums of money in widely advertising these products in this state and elsewhere, as a result of which it has established therein a valuable good will.

On or about October 30th, 1937, complainant in order to avail itself of the protection afforded by the statute, P.L. 1935 ch. 58 p. 140 (now Rev. Stat. §§ 56:4-3 et seq.), established…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Johnson & Johnson v. WeissbardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Ingersoll & Brother v. Hahne & Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Robert H. Ingersoll & Brother v. Hahne & Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
  5. Bristol-Myers Co. v. L. Bamberger Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lilly Co. v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. DeMartini v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Seagram Distillers Company v. CorenswetTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. The Borden Co. v. SchrederOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Schwegmann Brothers v. Calvert Distillers Corp. Schwegmann Brothers v. Seagram Distillers CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API