Ingersoll & Brother v. Hahne & Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill. On motion for preliminary injunction. On motion to strike out the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, V. C.
The bill discloses the following facts: The complainant is a manufacturer of watches, sold under the Ingersoll name, in conjunction with certain trade names, such as “Yankee Watch,” the “Dollar Watch,” the “Eclipse Watch” and “Junior Watch;” the “Yankee Watch” is advertised throughout the country to be sold to the consumer at $1.35; the only way the watches can be sold for this low price is to manufacture them in immense quantities, and the only way to produce customers upon a large scale is by extensive advertising; the name of Ingersoll, and tire reputation of the firm for fair…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bauer & Cie v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by18 opinions
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Joseph Triner Corp. v. McNeilIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Sears v. Western Thrift Stores of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
- Crue v. CaldwellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.