Legal Opinion
Robert H. Ingersoll & Brother v. Hahne & Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided August 24, 1918PublishedCited by 18 opinions
On bill, &c.
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, V. C.
This is a final hearing upon a bill filed to restrain the defendant from cutting prices on watches manufactured by complainant and sold at retail by defendant. The bill is set out in detail in my conclusions on the motion to strike it out. The proofs now before me demonstrate that the allegations of the bill are well founded; that complainant has built up a large business as a manufacturer of watches sold under its name in conjunction with certain trade names, such as Yankee Watch, the Dollar Watch, &c.; that at the time the bill was filed the Yankee Watch had been advertised by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by18 opinions
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Joseph Triner Corp. v. McNeilIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Port Chester Wine & Liquor Shop, Inc. v. Miller Bros. Fruiterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- American Shops, Inc. v. AM. FASHION, & C., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Clairol Inc. v. Cosmetics PlusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.