Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

PIERRE C. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1984No. A027051PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, Acting P. J.

Petitioner Pierre C. seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent superior court to hold an in camera hearing to determine whether certain police personnel files are discoverable. We conclude that petitioner made a sufficient showing under Evidence Code section 1043 1 and therefore we grant the requested relief.

Facts

Proceedings to establish that petitioner, a minor, came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 were commenced on the basis of a petition alleging that he had possessed marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359) and had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arcelona v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Tyler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Reyes v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Sacramento City Police Department v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. People v. Municipal Court (Hayden)California Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. HusteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Jalilie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. City of Redding v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API