Jalilie v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that a declaration of defendant's counsel submitted on information and belief, if it demonstrates that information from a police officer’s personnel records will facilitate the ascertainment of facts and a fair trial, is sufficient to support a discovery motion under Evidence Code section 1043.
Petitioner Fuad Jalilie is currently charged with two felony offenses in respondent superior court. Under Evidence Code section 1043 and Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 [113 Cal.Rptr. 897, 522 P.2d 305], Jalilie filed a motion to discover the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Arcelona v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. BoyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- City of Redding v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989