Legal Opinion

People v. Hustead

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1999No. F029647PublishedCited by 38 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARDAIZ, P. J.

Appellant, Zane Ira Hustead, was charged with felony evasion of arrest (Veh. Code, § 2800.2), and resisting arrest (Pen. Code, § 148), on August 19, 1997. It was further alleged that appellant had suffered two prior convictions within the meaning of Penal Code sections 667, subdivisions (c) through (j) and 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (e). Appellant pled not guilty to both counts and denied the allegations.

On August 28, 1997, appellant made a Pitchess 1 motion. At the hearing on the motion, the prosecution moved to dismiss the resisting arrest charge in furtherance of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Warrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. GainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. TownselCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. California Highway Patrol v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Fletcher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API