Hatalowich v. Bednarski
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from a Non Pros, issued by the Court of Common Pleas in Washington County. Appellant argues, inter alia, that a trial court lacks the authority to enter an order of Non Pros, sua sponte. We agree that this is the law; but it is not clear that any such motion was made. Therefore, we remand, under Pa.R.A.P. 1926, for a determination to be made as to whether or not a motion was made.
Without ever going to trial, this case has been in the courts for six years; including a period of total inactivity of more than two years. Under circumstances that would seem to clearly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. RiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Commonwealth v. WalshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wojciechowski v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- McCormick v. Allegheny General HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Moore v. Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Baker v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Roseman v. Hospital of University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.