Legal Opinion

Hatalowich v. Bednarski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1983No. 636PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from a Non Pros, issued by the Court of Common Pleas in Washington County. Appellant argues, inter alia, that a trial court lacks the authority to enter an order of Non Pros, sua sponte. We agree that this is the law; but it is not clear that any such motion was made. Therefore, we remand, under Pa.R.A.P. 1926, for a determination to be made as to whether or not a motion was made.

Without ever going to trial, this case has been in the courts for six years; including a period of total inactivity of more than two years. Under circumstances that would seem to clearly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. RiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Commonwealth v. WalshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. HobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wojciechowski v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. McCormick v. Allegheny General HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Moore v. Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Baker v. HornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Roseman v. Hospital of University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API