Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Walsh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1977No. 1116; 1120PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In each of the above-captioned cases, this court issued an order remanding the case for the filing of post-verdict motions, nunc pro tunc. Commonwealth v. Walsh, 248 Pa.Super. 479, 375 A.2d 198 (1977); Commonwealth v. Cameron, 249 Pa.Super. 146, 375 A.2d 802 (1977). In an attempt to comply with these orders, the lower court filed with our prothonotary, two documents entitled "Report to Superior Court on Remand Order." In these reports, the lower court judge stated that written post-verdict motions had been submitted by each appellant and denied by the court prior to the filing date of…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. WalshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. CameronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MichuckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. MazzochettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Hatalowich v. BednarskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. RobersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. VelezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API