Legal Opinion

Moore v. Mobil Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1984No. 2259 to 2262, 2269 to 2272PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The instant appeal arises from an Order by the lower court, sitting en banc, which denied the Appellants’ exceptions to a Decree Nisi. The lower court adopted the Chancellor’s Decree Nisi as its Final Decree. This action was initiated by the Appellee landowners to seek equitable relief as the result of the contamination of the Appellees’ ground water supplies.

The factual record, which is substantial in this case, shows the following:1 The Appellants, Elmer J. Custer, Jr., Russell A. Custer and Irvin E. Custer had for many years operated, as a partnership, a service station…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. School Dist. of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Duggan v. 807 Liberty Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Hatalowich v. BednarskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. School District of Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wayne County v. Tennessee Solid Waste Disposal Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  2. Houston v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Wojciechowski v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Hankin v. HankinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Simms v. Shearin, WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API