Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rini

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1981No. 1507PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

Appellant was convicted, in a jury trial, of indecent exposure. 18 Pa.C.S. § 3127. Appellant’s sole contention is that the court below erred in ruling that a defense witness would not be permitted to testify because her testimony was irrelevant. Because the record is inadequate to resolve this question, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for further proceedings.

Two high school girls testified for the Commonwealth that at approximately 9:00 a. m. on September 26,1977 they were crossing a bridge on their way to school, when they were distracted by a remark by an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. PiperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. State Dental Council & Examining Board v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. PanderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Sevin v. KelshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API