State v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant was convicted on two counts of first degree rape, ORS 163.375, six counts of first degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, and one count of first degree kidnapping. ORS 163.235. He appeals from the consecutive sentences imposed. We remand for resentencing.
Defendant first argues that the sentencing court failed to make the findings required under ORS 137.123(4) to impose consecutive sentences. State v. Racicot, 106 Or App 557, 809 P2d 726 (1991). Under ORS 137.123(4)(a), a court may impose a consecutive sentence if it finds that the criminal offense
“was not merely an incidental violation of a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. RacicotCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. SerhienkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. SealsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.