Legal Opinion
Moore v. Department of Military Affairs
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 1979No. Docket 78-1460, 78-1461PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P.J.
When plaintiffs retired from the Michigan National Guard, a dispute arose over the computation of their retirement benefits. The Supreme Court eventually determined that plaintiffs had been underpaid, and remanded to the Court of Claims for entry of summary judgments in favor of plaintiffs. Moore v Dep’t of Military Affairs, 398 Mich 324; 247 NW2d 801 (1976), Larkey v Dep’t of Military Affairs, 399 Mich 1036; 249 NW2d 302 (1977). On remand, the Court of Claims entered judgments on the principal amounts owing and determined that interest should run from the date it entered the judgments.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Vannoy v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Vannoy v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Militzer v. Kal-Die Casting Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Appeal of Computer Systems of America, Inc., Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- McGraw v. ParsonsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Greenleaf v. Department of State Highways & TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Curtin v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.