Legal Opinion

Commercial Savings Bank v. Wyandot County Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1988No. 87-1631PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In order for a writ of prohibition to issue, relators must establish: (1) that the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) that the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law, and (3) that the refusal of the writ will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists. State, ex rel. Starner, v. DeHoff (1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 163, 164, 18 OBR 219, 220, 480 N.E. 2d 449, 450; State, ex rel. Northern Ohio Tel. Co., v. Winter (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 6, 8, 52 O.O. 2d 29, 30, 260 N.E. 2d 827, 828.

Further, this court has allowed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State ex rel. Starner v. DehoffOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Stark v. Summit County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Largent v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. DonaldsonOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Coyne v. TodiaOhio Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API