State Ex Rel. Csank v. Jaffe
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
James M. Porter, Presiding Judge.
The relators, Paul Csank, Epeus Investment Company, John E. Rupert and William R. Heideloff, commenced this prohibition action against the respondent, Judge Harry Jaffe, to prevent the judge from either reconvening the original jury or convening a new jury to determine the issue of punitive damages in the underlying case, Rozic v. Epeus Invest. Co., Cuyahoga C.P. No. 240298. The respondent, through the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, moved to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment, and the relators have fully briefed their position. For the following…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Charles Franklin Westbrook, Jr., Pilot Point Ready-Mix, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee v. General Tire and Rubber Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- State ex rel. Largent v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Ellis v. McCabeOhio Supreme Court · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Garg v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State ex rel. Tri Eagle Fuels L.L.C. v. Dawson, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Novak v. Jane Boyle, Unpublished Decision (11-3-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State ex rel. Elder v. MatiaOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. Townsend v. CalabreseOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.