Selinger v. Milly
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HELD, J. pro tem.
This appeal is from an interlocutory decree entered in an action brought by plaintiff, Charles Selinger, to obtain a partition of certain real property in the city and county of San Francisco. An answer denying that plaintiff has any interest in the premises was filed; and by cross-complaint, the appellants sought to quiet title in themselves. The trial court adjudged plaintiff to he the owner of an undivided one-fifth interest in the premises, and appellants to be the owners of the remaining four-fifths interest. The latter, claiming title to the property to the exclusion of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Burns v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Eltinge v. SantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Katsivalis v. Serrano Reconveyance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kilmartin v. NasoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Mott v. NardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Estate of CecalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.