Legal Opinion

Selinger v. Milly

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1942No. Civ. 6629PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HELD, J. pro tem.

This appeal is from an interlocutory decree entered in an action brought by plaintiff, Charles Selinger, to obtain a partition of certain real property in the city and county of San Francisco. An answer denying that plaintiff has any interest in the premises was filed; and by cross-complaint, the appellants sought to quiet title in themselves. The trial court adjudged plaintiff to he the owner of an undivided one-fifth interest in the premises, and appellants to be the owners of the remaining four-fifths interest. The latter, claiming title to the property to the exclusion of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Burns v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Eltinge v. SantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Ions v. HarbisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Katsivalis v. Serrano Reconveyance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Kilmartin v. NasoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Mott v. NardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Estate of CecalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API