Legal Opinion

Eltinge v. Santos

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1915No. Sac. No. 2143PublishedCited by 31 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Maddux & Maddux, Griffin & Carlson, and R. R. Fowler, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment adverse to him and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The action was one to quiet title to plaintiff’s land, to declare two certain buildings erected by defendant on a strip of land northwest of plaintiff’s property a nuisance as being on a public street; to require the removal of said buildings; to enjoin defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s access to the street on which it was alleged the said buildings had been placed, and for damages. The court granted all of the relief prayed for, except the money asked by way of damages.

Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Carolina Central Railroad v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Wolfe v. Town of SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. City of Manhattan Beach v. CortelyouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. County of Inyo v. GivenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Lord Construction Co. v. Edison Portland Cement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API