Legal Opinion
Kilmartin v. Naso
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 1951No. Civ. No. 14702PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Sarah Naso, as administratrix with the will annexed of the estate of Filippo Cecala, has appealed from an order of the superior court which set aside certain *528real property as a homestead to Thomas F. Kilmartin, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Rosaría Cecala.
Filippo and Rosaría Cecala were husband and wife. During their married life they acquired as community property a 15.775-acre parcel of land on Redmond Road, and an undivided one-fourth interest in a 23-acre parcel on Almadén Road, Los Gatos, California. On May 1, 1933, a declaration of homestead…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Morrison v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In Re the Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Estate of BuckhantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Huntington v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Estate of Sparling v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Waters v. JenningsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.