City Street Improvement Co. v. Quigley
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.
This is an action to recover a street assessment for the improvement of Moraga Avenue, between Eighth and Ninth Avenues. Plaintiff recovered judgment and the defendant appeals. The assessment is a frontage assessment levied under the street improvement ordinance of the city and county of San Francisco, No. 2685, new series, the provisions of which ordinance have been before this court in a number of recent cases. (Bienfield v. Van Ness, 176 Cal. 585 [169 Pac. 225] ; City Street Improvement Co. v. Pearson, 181 Cal. 640 [20 A. L. R. 1317, 185 Pac. 962]; Federal Const. Co. v. Wolf son, 186 Cal.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City Street Improvement Co. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bienfield v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Federal Construction Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Federal Construction Co. v. NewhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gallagher v. FoerstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923