Legal Opinion

Arnesen v. Rowe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1955No. 33172PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is an action to recover the amount of profits alleged to have been lost when, due to the negligence of respondents in repairing the engine, the appellants were deprived of the use of a vessel known as the “Wireless” during the fishing season. The court sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint. The plaintiffs declined to plead further; and the court entered judgment dismissing the action, from which judgment plaintiffs appeal.

Since the demurrer admits the truth of all material allegations that are well pleaded, we shall, for the purpose of examining the amended complaint, set forth…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Platts v. ArneyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McMahan v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Ellis v. SchwankWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Arkansas Machine & Boiler Works v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Galowich v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Walker v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Seals v. SealsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Pearson v. SchubachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API