Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Schwank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1950No. 31234PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, C. J.

This action was instituted for the purpose of recovering the value of a one-half interest in the estate of Gottlop Schwank, deceased. A demurrer to the complaint was presented and sustained. Plaintiff appealed to this court.

The pertinent portions of the complaint are as follows:

“I. At all times pertinent to this action, the plaintiff is and has been the daughter of Gottlop Schwank, now deceased. That during his lifetime, the said Gottlop Schwank acknowledged in writing, witnessed by competent witnesses, that plaintiff was his daughter, and the said Gottlop Schwank deposited said writings in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Gaines Et Ux. v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Brazil v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Seventh Elect Church v. First Seattle Dexter Horton National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Patterson v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gerlach v. SchultzIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Pitzer v. Union Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Francon v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Arnesen v. RoweWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Pitzer v. Union Bank of Cal.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API