Legal Opinion

Crowe, Chizek, & Co. v. Oil Technology, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 2002No. 45A05-0110-CV-458PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Crowe, Chizek & Company, L.L.P. (Crowe) appeals the trial court's denial of its motion for summary judgment with regard to the appellee-plaintiff Oil Technology, Inc.'s (Oil Tech) cause of action against it for accountant malpractice. Specifically, Crowe argues that the trial court erred in refusing to apply the statute of limitations set forth in the Accountancy Act 1 to bar Oil Tech's negligence claim. Crowe contends that the statute was not tolled by the continuing wrong or fraudulent concealment doe-trines and argues that the Accountancy Act's…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. McIntosh v. Melroe Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross v. Indiana State Board of NursingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Bambi's Roofing, Inc. v. MoriartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. KPMG, Peat Marwick, LLP v. Carmel Financial Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Heaton & Eadie Professional Services Corp. v. Corneal Consultants of Indiana, P.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Fox v. RiceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API