Pollock Mining & Milling Co. v. Davenport
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Oourt, Silver Bow Oounty; E. W. Harney, Judge. Action by Pollock Mining & Milling Company, a corporation, against Lee Davenport. Erom a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
MR. COMMISSIONER CALLAWAY
prepared tbe following opinion for the court:
Action to quiet title. Tbe plaintiff, a corporation, alleged itself to be in tbe possession of tbe premises in controversy, and “tbat tbe said plaintiff claims to be tbe owner of, and claims title in fee to, tbe said premises, and tbat tbe said defendant claims an estate or interest therein adverse to tbe said plaintiff; tbat tbe claim of tbe said defendant is without any right whatever ; and tbat tbe said defendant has not any estate, right, title or interest whatever in said lands or premises or any part there*453of.” To this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennie v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Merk v. Bowery Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Hefferlin v. KarlmanMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Liebrand v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Pierce v. FelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Le Vasseur v. RoullmanMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Sanborn v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1941
- Violet v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Slette v. Review Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
- Custer v. Missoula Public Service Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.