Custer v. Missoula Public Service Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
The question in this case is the sufficiency of plaintiff’s' complaint. The court sustained a general and special demurrer thereto, upon which it entered judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appealed.
The following allegations, in substance, appear in the complaint: Plaintiff is the owner of the Bandmann Ranch, which is described by legal subdivisions. A portion of the ranch was sold by Daniel E. Bandmann, a predecessor in interest of plaintiff, to A. H. Wetliey, a predecessor in interest of defendant, upon which a dam (across the Missoula or Hell Gate River), called the Clark dam,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allen v. PetrickMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Galiger v. McNultyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Johnston v. Little Horse Creek Irrigating Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1904
- Norman v. CorbleyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Donich v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rock Creek Ditch & Flume Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Gray v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Energy Oils, Inc. v. Montana Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Gans & Klein Investment Co. v. SanfordMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Baker Ditch Co. v. District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial District of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.