Legal Opinion

Le Vasseur v. Roullman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1933No. 7,006PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

The plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to residence property in Missoula. He designated as defendants twenty-five persons, supplementing those named with “and all. other persons,” etc. Some of the designated defendants disclaimed any interest in the property, four defaulted, and at the trial the plaintiff dismissed as to others.

Prior to her death many years ago the property belonged to Julia Le Vasseur, who died intestate, leaving as her heirs her husband and nine children, one of whom is the plaintiff; the heirs were entitled to the property in the proportions of one-third to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StandleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bullerdick v. HermsmeyerMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Smith v. DuffMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Streicher v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Hopkins v. NoyesMontana Supreme Court · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. GlausMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Brannon v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Wilson v. ChestnutMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Anderson v. MacEMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Nadeau v. Texas CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API