Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Koppers Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 28, 1981No. Civ. A. C80-830PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above captioned case are the motion of defendant Koppers Company, Inc. (Koppers) to dismiss and the motions of Allied Chemical Corporation and Salem Corporation for summary judgment on the basis that this action is barred by the running of the statute of limitations. 1 Because defendants’ motions include material not specifically included in the pleadings, the motions shall be treated jointly as defendants’ motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This action was originally initiated by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Trimper v. Porter-HaydenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Sonja Lujan, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kimberly Lujan, Deceased v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Anthony Crane Rental, Inc. v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Downs v. Steel and Craft Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.