Legal Opinion

Trimper v. Porter-Hayden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 17, 1985No. 38, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The question presented in these consolidated appeals is whether wrongful death and survival actions involving exposures to asbestos are time barred when brought more than three years after death or whether some form of discovery rule applies. For reasons hereinafter set forth we shall hold that two separate time bars, each of which began to run at death, had respectively expired prior to suit on these latent disease claims.

One of the plaintiffs below and an appellant here is Charlotte M. Trimper (Charlotte), the widow of Frank R. Trimper (Frank). Charlotte’s complaint avers…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Barrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Ciccarelli v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pennwalt Corp. v. NasiosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. O'HARA v. KovensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Geisz v. Greater Baltimore Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Georgia Pacific Corp. v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API